♦
Are there differences in the assignee corporation supplied by the annuity providers?
In a structured settlement involving a qualified assignment. the claimant insists that the defendant/carrier remain liable in case both the life insurance company and the qualified assignee company default. If the defendant/carrier agrees to remain liable for the future annuity payments, can they still use a qualified assignment?
How important is it that a settlement agreement be drafted if a release has been signed by the parties?
Why do we insist that a self-insured defendant commit to a Qualified Assignment?
